Building an adventure
The law of the instrument states that "if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail". In other words, the tools you have available very much influence how you approach any given task. That is very noticeable to me when creating adventures for Dungeons & Dragons. I used to be a DM in my first 15 years of roleplaying, then went 15 years as a player, and now I'm back to being a DM. And both technological progress and my financial situation have changed a lot in those 15 years. Which means that today I have a whole lot of different and more powerful tools at my disposal than in my first DMing period.
Technology has a way of becoming so ubiquitous that many people can't remember how life was before some technology arrived. When I created my first dungeons 30 years ago, my computer was a ZX81 with 16k of memory, and there was no internet. I drew my dungeons by hand on graph paper, and wrote notes on monsters and treasures by hand. Later I had an Amiga with a 9-needle dot matrix printer, where I could print out adventure notes on green continuous form paper. Then I went to university, where I encountered the first versions of the internet: Not with HTML and browsers, but using Telnet protocol to access bulletin board services and Usenet on a green on black, text-only screen. Especially Usenet had a wealth of materials for pen & paper roleplaying, like lists of magic items or traps.
Today I have access to a much larger internet, via broadband, and online applications like D&D Insider. I have computer aided design software like Campaign Cartographer to draw dungeons, and a color laser printer to print them out. And I have software like Evernote for taking notes and sorting them into an adventure. And with all those shiny new tools, I find that building an adventure is a very changed experience.
D&D adventures from the 80's often started with the dungeon you drew on graph paper, and then you populated the rooms with monsters you more or less randomly picked from the Monster Manual. Even the commercially available adventures looked like that, room after room full of monsters, with story being thin on the ground. Today I'd follow advice like that of the D&D Adventure Building Workshop and start by creating a villain, whose motivation then gives rise to a story. I also brainstorm and take notes with Evernote of all crazy ideas I have what could make for a memorable encounter for my adventure. And once I collected enough ideas and got the basics of the story, I start fleshing everything out.
My "dungeons" thus start as a cloud of ideas for encounters, which then get connected and sorted into something like an adventure flow chart. There are combat encounters, story & roleplaying encounters, traps, skill challenges, and exploration. Only then do I start forming the relevant parts of that flow chart into a dungeon. Which is easy, because a dungeon is nothing elre but a flow chart of encounters, with every crossroads being a decision point.
Of course the law of the instrument still applies. For example my color laser printer uses DIN A4 paper of 210 x 297 mm size. Divide that into 1" squares and you get 8 x 11 squares on one page. Which means that unless I want to spend extra money on having larger battle maps printed, it would be good if my dungeon rooms would fit on 8 x 11 squares, or 16 x 11 if needed for a series of rooms where combat is likely to spill over from one room to the next. Of course the dungeon map is much larger, but I don't hand out the whole map to the players, I only need to print the rooms for the encounters.
The creative process works differently for different people. I like building adventures slowly, taking notes of ideas for encounters over weeks before starting with the dungeon. The "You open a door to a 3x3 room. There are 3 orcs in here." kind of classic dungeons which was fun in the 80's appears rather outdated to me these days. I now prefer fewer, but more elaborate encounters, with a better logic of why that monster would be in that location, and where it fits in with the story and the motivation of the villain. That kind of encounter also works better if the players do something unexpected, like trying to negotiate instead of fighting. But most importantly I find that by building my adventures that way, I end up with more memorable encounters and interactive stories.
Technology has a way of becoming so ubiquitous that many people can't remember how life was before some technology arrived. When I created my first dungeons 30 years ago, my computer was a ZX81 with 16k of memory, and there was no internet. I drew my dungeons by hand on graph paper, and wrote notes on monsters and treasures by hand. Later I had an Amiga with a 9-needle dot matrix printer, where I could print out adventure notes on green continuous form paper. Then I went to university, where I encountered the first versions of the internet: Not with HTML and browsers, but using Telnet protocol to access bulletin board services and Usenet on a green on black, text-only screen. Especially Usenet had a wealth of materials for pen & paper roleplaying, like lists of magic items or traps.
Today I have access to a much larger internet, via broadband, and online applications like D&D Insider. I have computer aided design software like Campaign Cartographer to draw dungeons, and a color laser printer to print them out. And I have software like Evernote for taking notes and sorting them into an adventure. And with all those shiny new tools, I find that building an adventure is a very changed experience.
D&D adventures from the 80's often started with the dungeon you drew on graph paper, and then you populated the rooms with monsters you more or less randomly picked from the Monster Manual. Even the commercially available adventures looked like that, room after room full of monsters, with story being thin on the ground. Today I'd follow advice like that of the D&D Adventure Building Workshop and start by creating a villain, whose motivation then gives rise to a story. I also brainstorm and take notes with Evernote of all crazy ideas I have what could make for a memorable encounter for my adventure. And once I collected enough ideas and got the basics of the story, I start fleshing everything out.
My "dungeons" thus start as a cloud of ideas for encounters, which then get connected and sorted into something like an adventure flow chart. There are combat encounters, story & roleplaying encounters, traps, skill challenges, and exploration. Only then do I start forming the relevant parts of that flow chart into a dungeon. Which is easy, because a dungeon is nothing elre but a flow chart of encounters, with every crossroads being a decision point.
Of course the law of the instrument still applies. For example my color laser printer uses DIN A4 paper of 210 x 297 mm size. Divide that into 1" squares and you get 8 x 11 squares on one page. Which means that unless I want to spend extra money on having larger battle maps printed, it would be good if my dungeon rooms would fit on 8 x 11 squares, or 16 x 11 if needed for a series of rooms where combat is likely to spill over from one room to the next. Of course the dungeon map is much larger, but I don't hand out the whole map to the players, I only need to print the rooms for the encounters.
The creative process works differently for different people. I like building adventures slowly, taking notes of ideas for encounters over weeks before starting with the dungeon. The "You open a door to a 3x3 room. There are 3 orcs in here." kind of classic dungeons which was fun in the 80's appears rather outdated to me these days. I now prefer fewer, but more elaborate encounters, with a better logic of why that monster would be in that location, and where it fits in with the story and the motivation of the villain. That kind of encounter also works better if the players do something unexpected, like trying to negotiate instead of fighting. But most importantly I find that by building my adventures that way, I end up with more memorable encounters and interactive stories.
Comments
Post a Comment